PE anti-mouse CD115 (CSF-1R) Antibody

Pricing & Availability
Clone
AFS98 (See other available formats)
Regulatory Status
RUO
Other Names
CSF-1R, M-CSFR, c-fms
Isotype
Rat IgG2a, κ
Ave. Rating
Submit a Review
Product Citations
publications
A_AFS98_PE_102309
Thioglycolate-elicited BALB/c mouse peritoneal macrophages stained with rat IgG1, k PE and CD11b FITC.
  • A_AFS98_PE_102309
    Thioglycolate-elicited BALB/c mouse peritoneal macrophages stained with rat IgG1, k PE and CD11b FITC.
  • B_AFS98_PE_102309
    Thioglycolate-elicited BALB/c mouse peritoneal macrophages stained with AFS98 PE and CD11b FITC.
Compare all formats See PE spectral data
Cat # Size Price Quantity Check Availability Save
135505 50 µg $117
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
135506 200 µg $360
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
Description

CSF-1R, also known as CD115 and M-CSFR, is a single-pass type I membrane protein and member of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor family. This c-fms (Fms proto-oncogene) gene product's natural ligands include M-CSF and IL-34. Structural studies of CD115 have described an Ig-like extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, an intracellular juxtamembrane domain, a split tyrosine kinase domain, and a C-terminal tail receptor. Receptor activation induces homodimerization in addition to phosphorylation and ubiquitination of intracellular residues. CD115 directly influences tissue macrophage and osteoclast differentiation and proliferation. It is expressed on monocytes/macrophages, peritoneal exudate cells, plasmacytoid and conventional dendritic cells, and osteoclasts.

Product Details
Technical data sheet

Product Details

Verified Reactivity
Mouse
Antibody Type
Monoclonal
Host Species
Rat
Formulation
Phosphate-buffered solution, pH 7.2, containing 0.09% sodium azide.
Preparation
The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography, and conjugated with PE under optimal conditions.
Concentration
0.2 mg/ml
Storage & Handling
The antibody solution should be stored undiluted between 2°C and 8°C, and protected from prolonged exposure to light. Do not freeze.
Application

FC - Quality tested

Recommended Usage

Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For flow cytometric staining, the suggested use of this reagent is ≤ 0.25 µg per 106 cells in 100 µl volume. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.

Excitation Laser
Blue Laser (488 nm)
Green Laser (532 nm)/Yellow-Green Laser (561 nm)
Application Notes

Additional reported applications (for the relevant formats) include: blocking of ligand binding1. The LEAF™ purified antibody (Endotoxin <0.1 EU/µg, Azide-Free, 0.2 µm filtered) is recommended for functional assays.

It has been reported that CD115 can be rapidly internalized, especially when samples are exposed to room temperature. Approximate 33% decrease in CD115 expression has been observed between 0 and 4 hours after sample collection, while overnight incubation of the cells results in complete CD115 downregulation. Pre-treatment with EDTA and low temperatures (2 to 8°C) helps in maintaining surface expression of CD1154.

Application References

(PubMed link indicates BioLegend citation)
  1. Sudo T, et al. 1995. Oncogene 11:2469.
  2. Murayama T, et al. 1999. Circulation 99:1740.
  3. Jaeger BN, et al. 2012. J. Exp. Med. 209:565. PubMed
  4. Breslin WL, et al. 2013. J Immunol Methods. 390(1-2):1 PubMed
  5. Dong L, et al. 2016. Nature. 539:304–308. PubMed
Product Citations
  1. Combes F, et al. 2018. Neoplasia. 20:848. PubMed
  2. Sierro F, et al. 2017. Immunity. 47:374. PubMed
  3. Rosina M, et al. 2022. Cell Metab. 34:533. PubMed
  4. Liang Y, et al. 2021. Cell Death Differ. 28:2728. PubMed
  5. Koyama M, et al. 2015. J Exp Med. 212: 1303 - 1321. PubMed
  6. Takacs E, et al. 2017. J Immunol. 198:239. PubMed
  7. Schloss MJ, et al. 2022. Nat Immunol. 23:605. PubMed
  8. Suresh R, et al. 2020. J Immunother Cancer. 8:. PubMed
  9. Groenen AG, et al. 2022. J Lipid Res. 63:100167. PubMed
  10. Tripathi H, et al. 2020. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 149:95. PubMed
  11. Bouchareychas L, et al. 2021. iScience. 24(8):102847. PubMed
  12. Oliveira-Lima OC, et al. 2015. Immunobiology. . PubMed
  13. Jackson A, et al. 2014. J Leukoc Biol. 92:609. PubMed
  14. Lee MH, et al. 2018. J Immunol Res. 2018:1601079. PubMed
  15. Johnson KD, et al. 2022. Blood Adv. 6:1464. PubMed
  16. Tan X, et al. 2016. PLoS One. 11: 0160985. PubMed
  17. Sakai M, et al. 2020. Immunity. 51(4):655-670. PubMed
  18. Garcia–Agudo LF, et al. 2019. FASEB J. :fj201900337R. PubMed
  19. Bowers E, et al. 2018. Nat Med. 24:95. PubMed
  20. Bratti M, et al. 2022. Front Immunol. 13:1029759. PubMed
  21. Hreha TN, et al. 2020. Front Immunol. 1.597916667. PubMed
  22. LeBlond ND, et al. 2020. J Lipid Res. 61:1697. PubMed
  23. Yang F, et al. 2020. Cancer Res. 80:3677. PubMed
  24. Fuster JJ, et al. 2020. Cell Rep. 33:108326. PubMed
  25. Jtte BB, et al. 2021. iScience. 24(8):102833. PubMed
  26. He W et al. 2018. Immunity. 49(6):1175-1190 . PubMed
  27. Voisin M, et al. 2021. Commun Biol. 4:420. PubMed
  28. Eisele AS, et al. 2022. Elife. 11:. PubMed
  29. Smith C, et al. 2012. Cancer Discovery. 2:722. PubMed
  30. Distel E, et al. 2014. Circ Res . 115:759. PubMed
  31. Barman PK, et al. 2019. J Immunol. 202:2720. PubMed
  32. Chen X et al. 2017. Cell stem cell. 21(6):747-760 . PubMed
  33. Anderson SR, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 27:2002. PubMed
  34. La Rose AM, et al. 2021. Mol Metab. 53:101265. PubMed
  35. Kuhn JA, et al. 2021. Elife. 10:. PubMed
  36. Aktories P, et al. 2022. Cell Rep Methods. 2:100260. PubMed
  37. Tripathi H, et al. 2020. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 0.953472222. PubMed
  38. Ding P, et al. 2022. Bone Res. 10:42. PubMed
  39. Bouchareychas L, et al. 2020. Cell Reports. 32(2):107881. PubMed
  40. Li W, et al. 2021. PLoS Pathog. 17:e1009462. PubMed
  41. Gadd V, et al. 2016. PLoS One. 11: 0157771. PubMed
  42. Burgener SS, et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 27:3646. PubMed
  43. Wang W, et al. 2021. J Am Heart Assoc. 10:e019142. PubMed
  44. Johansson J, et al. 2013. J Neurosci. 33:16016. PubMed
  45. Clemente C, et al. 2018. Nat Commun. 9:910. PubMed
  46. Evrard M et al. 2018. Immunity. 48(2):364-379 . PubMed
  47. Alexander Mildner et al. 2017. Immunity. 46(5):849-862 . PubMed
  48. LeBlond ND, et al. 2020. J Lipid Res. 61:1697. PubMed
  49. Clemente–Casares X, et al. 2017. Immunity. 47:974. PubMed
  50. Ulrich V, et al. 2016. EMBO Mol Med. 8: 643 - 653. PubMed
  51. Mairhofer D, et al. 2015. J Invest Dermatol. 135: 2785-93. PubMed
  52. Chen S, et al. 2014. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 446:1002. PubMed
  53. Foster G, et al. 2015. J Immunol. 195: 5380 - 5392. PubMed
  54. Jain A, et al. 2020. Nat Immunol. 0.920138889. PubMed
  55. Aryal B, et al. 2016. Nat Commun. 7:12313. PubMed
  56. Ryu J, et al. 2013. Circulation. 127:710. PubMed
  57. Petriello MC, et al. 2018. Toxicol Sci. 162:548. PubMed
  58. Spiljar M, et al. 2021. Cell Metab. 33:2231. PubMed
  59. Hussein M, et al. 2015. PLoS One. 10: 0135218. PubMed
  60. Tran S, et al. 2020. Immunity. 53(3):627-640.e5. PubMed
  61. Yáñez A et al. 2017. Immunity. 47(5):890-902 . PubMed
  62. Di Liberto G et al. 2018. Cell. 175(2):458-471 . PubMed
  63. Steinmetz O, et al. 2016. J Infect Dis. 10.1093/infdis/jiv763. PubMed
RRID
AB_1937254 (BioLegend Cat. No. 135505)
AB_1937253 (BioLegend Cat. No. 135506)

Antigen Details

Structure
Ig superfamily, 145 kD
Distribution

Monocytes/macrophages, peritoneal exudate cells, plasmacytoid and conventional dendritic cells, osteoclasts

Function
Growth factor receptor, tyrosine kinase
Ligand/Receptor
Macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), IL-34
Cell Type
Dendritic cells, Macrophages, Monocytes, Osteoclasts
Biology Area
Immunology
Molecular Family
CD Molecules, Cytokine/Chemokine Receptors
Antigen References
  1. Sudo T, et al. 1995 Oncogene 11:2469.
  2. Murayama T, et al. 1999 Circulation 99:1740.
  3. Goswami S, et al. 2005 Cancer Res. 65:5278.
  4. Yu W, et al. 2008 J. Leuko. Biol. 84:852.
Gene ID
12978 View all products for this Gene ID
UniProt
View information about CD115 on UniProt.org

Related FAQs

What type of PE do you use in your conjugates?
We use R-PE in our conjugates.
Why do I have a weak CD115 staining?

It has been reported that CD115 can be rapidly internalized, especially when samples are exposed to room temperature. Approximate 33% decrease in CD115 expression has been observed between 0 and 4 hours after sample collection, while overnight incubation of the cells results in complete CD115 downregulation.  Pre-treatment with EDTA and low temperatures (2 - 8°C) helps in maintaining surface expression of CD115. In addition, brief fixation of the cells with Fixation Buffer (Cat. No. 420801) for 10 minutes will block CD115 internalization.

Go To Top Version: 1    Revision Date: 11/30/2012

For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic or therapeutic use.

 

This product is supplied subject to the terms and conditions, including the limited license, located at www.biolegend.com/terms) ("Terms") and may be used only as provided in the Terms. Without limiting the foregoing, BioLegend products may not be used for any Commercial Purpose as defined in the Terms, resold in any form, used in manufacturing, or reverse engineered, sequenced, or otherwise studied or used to learn its design or composition without express written approval of BioLegend. Regardless of the information given in this document, user is solely responsible for determining any license requirements necessary for user’s intended use and assumes all risk and liability arising from use of the product. BioLegend is not responsible for patent infringement or any other risks or liabilities whatsoever resulting from the use of its products.

 

BioLegend, the BioLegend logo, and all other trademarks are property of BioLegend, Inc. or their respective owners, and all rights are reserved.

 

8999 BioLegend Way, San Diego, CA 92121 www.biolegend.com
Toll-Free Phone: 1-877-Bio-Legend (246-5343) Phone: (858) 768-5800 Fax: (877) 455-9587

This data display is provided for general comparisons between formats.
Your actual data may vary due to variations in samples, target cells, instruments and their settings, staining conditions, and other factors.
If you need assistance with selecting the best format contact our expert technical support team.

ProductsHere

Login/Register
Remember me
Forgot your password? Reset Password
Request an Account